Watches ComparisonQuestion guides & tools

Question guides & tools

Is it bad to not wear an automatic watch for a long time?

Watches Comparison editorial · Published 2026-10-18 · AI-assisted preparation

Nothing in Seiko's manufacturer material shows that leaving an automatic watch unworn damages it. What it does establish is that the watch will stop once the power reserve is exhausted, and that some movements can be restarted by hand winding.

A hypothetical: the watch in the drawer

Say you own an automatic watch and you rotate it out of your regular wear for a few weeks. It sits in a drawer while you wear something else. What happens? According to Seiko's mechanical caliber page, the outcome is straightforward: the mainspring, wound by the motion of your wrist through the rotor, stops receiving energy. Once the stored energy is used up, the watch stops. For the Seiko caliber 6R20 described on that page, the Spron 510 mainspring generates a power reserve of more than 45 hours. So, hypothetically, roughly two days after that watch leaves your wrist, it is no longer telling time.

[2]

That is the concrete, documented effect of not wearing an automatic watch: it stops. A stopped watch is not, on the evidence here, a broken watch. You reset the time and restart it.

[2]

What the manufacturer pages actually support

It is worth being honest about the limits. The two Seiko pages used here cover the history of quartz timekeeping and the specification of certain mechanical calibers. Neither page discusses what happens to an automatic movement over months or years of storage, whether lubricants degrade from inactivity, whether regular running is beneficial, or whether a watch winder is recommended. Those are common questions, but they cannot be answered from this material, and inventing rules of thumb would be misleading.

[1][2][2]

A practical comparison: automatic versus quartz for intermittent wear

The comparison the sources do allow is about what each type of watch needs to keep running. Seiko describes the quartz watch as having a crystal oscillator at its core for accuracy, with the first commercially viable quartz watch, the Seiko Quartz ASTRON, released on December 25, 1969. Its timekeeping does not depend on being worn. An automatic watch, by contrast, depends on motion to stay wound. If your habit is to wear a watch only occasionally, that difference matters: the automatic will need attention each time you pick it up, while the quartz movement's design has no such dependence on wrist motion.

[1][2]

A decision process, not a rule

Because the manufacturer material does not define a safe or unsafe storage duration, the honest approach is a verification process rather than a fixed rule. Here is how to work through it:

[2][2]

Next step: find your watch's caliber, read the manufacturer's care page for that movement, and note what it says about winding, power reserve and storage before you decide how often the watch needs to be worn or wound. If you are choosing between an automatic and a quartz model in the first place, factor those care habits into the decision alongside price and warranty terms.

[2]

Sources and dates

  1. https://www.seikowatches.com/uk-en/customerservice/knowledge/quartz-knowledge · accessed 2026-10-18
  2. https://www.seikowatches.com/uk-en/customerservice/knowledge/mechanical-knowledge · accessed 2026-10-18

Put this into practice

Start a search on watchescomparison.com

Open the site tool

Read the watch-reference checklist →

Open this page

Diesel Mega Chief DZ4290 Men's Watch – 51mm Grey Dial Leather

Open this page

Diesel Mega Chief DZ4283 Men's Watch – 51mm Black Dial Stainless Steel

Open this page

Related questions